No HopeBama continues Bush's policy of terrorizing the people of the world. G W terrorized the Iraqi people so B H simply shifted the focus to terrorize the people of Afghanistan. So what if hundreds (or hundreds of thousands) of civilians are killed as long as one terrorist is in the bunch?
The American People were hoodwinked into voting for a new face on the old Bush/Cheney policy of terrorizing civilian populations around the world and protecting the special corporate interests via Wall Street and Health Insurance Corporate Bail Outs.
The Washington bubble is doing its job so No Hope Obama doesn't have to hear the cries of the people.
Killing civilians creates terrorists and does NOT make us safer. Where's the change No Hope Obama promised us?
Hat Tip to Omar Shah at the Huffington Post.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Your link to Omar Shah shows 404.
Last I heard, Obama has changed the ROE to prevent any firefights that may harm civilians, including not shooting at terrorists if they are walking away from IED's that they have just planted.
Yes, I know that any combat in your mind is horrible and its all our fault. I know I won't change your mind about that, but, I thought that you might like to know that Obama has implemented very restrictive rules of engagement. So restrictive that we WILL lose soldiers.
There's a big difference between what Americans "hear" from the "corporate" media and reality. In Afghanistan the people are up in arms because of the children being killed by our weapons and our soldiers.
We all need to face reality and realize that the number one American export to the world is murder--via the weapons we sell to others.
Post a Comment