Showing posts with label 9/11 commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9/11 commission. Show all posts

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Ex-Governor Jesse Ventura Speaks Out on 9/11

This is a significant interview with a prominent political and social personality, ex-Governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura. The ramifications of what he is stating raise this disturbing question for all Americans to ponder: Was the attack on the World Trade Center a criminal conspiracy that went well beyond al Qaeda, a conspiracy that included elements of our own intelligence agencies, or those of our allies?

Here is the interview in three parts:



Part 2


Part 3


We welcome your comments on the Governor's interview.

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11

Last September or so, US Navy Top Gun Pilot Ralph Kolstad spoke out about 9/11, more or less dissing the 9/11 Commission Report, pointing out that he could not perform some of the maneuvers the 9/11 Commission claimed the minimally trained hijackers managed to pull off. Something stinks to high Heaven he states.

What might that be? The entire scenario that the Bush Administration constructed to explain 9/11 and take us to war perhaps?

Here is the link to the original article in the video if you are having trouble reading it: click here

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Two Attack 9/11 Commission - Book Review















Aren't you tired of these weirdos and nihilistic space-cases that keep attacking the 9/11 Commission? I mean, the Commission was comprised of honorable men doing the best they could under trying conditions, wasn't it?

And these nuts have even written a book to try to prove their preposterous case. Here is a synopsis of what these two crazies have to say in it:

"(They) devoted the first chapter on how they believed the Commission was set up for failure......listed a number of reasons why they thought this, including the late start of the Commission and the very short deadline imposed; the insufficient funds, 3 million dollars, initially allocated for conducting such an extensive investigation (later the Commission requested and received additional funds, but the chairs still felt hamstrung); the many politicians who did not want the Commission formed; the continuing resistance and opposition to the work of the Commission by many politicians, particularly those who did not wish to be blamed for any of what happened; and the denial of access by various agencies to documents and witnesses."
(source)

And it just goes on and on in this critical vein. Give me a break!

And just who are these clowns?

Two guys named Kean and Hamilton. Even the names sound phony. To be exact, former Governor of New Jersey Thomas Kean and former Congressman Lee Hamilton.

And what possible credentials could they have to make them some kind of experts on the Commission?

They were the co-chairs of the Commission.

Sureeeeeeeeee, big deal! They're still fringe nutjobs trying to bring America down.

The name of their attention-seeking book by the way is: Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission.

And I'll leave you with this parting, ridiculous book quote by them, just so you can have a good laugh:

"So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail."

-Book Review by Richard I. R. Cheney (no relation to the current CEO of Halliburton)

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

MIT Engineer Jeff King on 9/11






















(source) Note the sharp 45 degree cut, with molten slag, on the massive steel column in the far background. Quite a glaring contradiction to the official theory that the Twin Towers simply collapsed spontaneously from fire and impact. This had to have been quite a talented cataclysm to make such a neat cut. Any steel worker or demolition expert will immediately recognize that such a cut in steel could only be made with some kind of torch or other method that can produce intense, sharply focused heat and energy, leaving the tell-tale slag. But this steel is way too thick for a torch. That leaves one other obvious suspect: a shaped cutter-charge.

***************************

There is a myth out there in the mainstream media that there is a consensus among engineers and architects that the official 9/11 Commission-NIST-FEMA reports, which state that fire and plane impact brought down the Twin Towers, closes the book on the subject.

Nothing could be farther from the truth! As I write, there are now at least 186 engineering and architectural professionals who officially reject the official theory. (Reference)

Jeff King, an engineer from MIT who is one of them, recently gave a powerful presentation at a forum on 9/11. Here is a You Tube video capturing a ten minute excerpt: see video

You can find this one and 151 others at 911triumph. And there are many other sites. Thousands of people have been pouring over all the available evidence in attempts to reconstruct what really happened.

Of course the government, which wisked away all the crime scene evidence in a matter of days, is also holding on to even more evidence, lots of it, and refusing to release it. Even so, enough is known now to demand a new, independent investigation. America will never be whole again until all the truth comes out.

On that fateful day, September 11, 2001 the country turned down the path of fear, a path that ultimately leads to the lowest pit of Hell if you continue down it long enough.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

The Elephant In The Room:Kevin McPadden, 9/11-1st Responder

9/11



The books have not closed on 9/11, not by a long shot. There are actually more unanswered questions than ever before, and new contradictions pop up weekly. For instance, note this video, which throws a monkey wrench into all the official protestations that there was not, not, not any controlled demolition at WTC7, you know, the building that just went swisshh and collapsed on the afternoon of 9/11. That was not too long after Larry Silverstein issued his famous "pull it" statement.

"Pull it" means only one thing in demolition parlance: take the building down. Larry later said he meant, "pull the firefighters", although they were apparently largely out of the building anyway. What followed was one of the worst cases of identity-theft in history, a building collapse trying to look just like a controlled demolition without actually being one, or so we are told. But this video puts us right back to square one. BOOOOMM!

Thursday, September 21, 2006

What Motivated the 9/11 Hijackers?

Why did the 9/11 Commission not thoroughly and objectively study this question?